Cases 11 - 20 of 44,985
United States v. Robert Woods
as 24-2147
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Q. Woods
Expert Management, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Expert Management, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Defense, Secretary of the Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Ford v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Ford
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Brianna Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kistler v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05037
Plaintiff:
Francis James Kistler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Twenty Thousand, One Hundred Dollars in U.S. Currency
as 4:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Twenty Thousand, One Hundred Dollars in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Appleby v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Nicholas Appleby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States v. Frank Robinson, III
as 24-2138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank Robinson, III, also known as Gucci
United States v. Brandon Castillo-Barreda
as 24-2140
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Castillo-Barreda
State of Arkansas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-2144
Petitioner:
State of Arkansas and Arkansas Department of Energy and the Environment, Division of Environmental Quality
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
