Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Morgan v. Washington County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2021cv05118
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Detective C. Strange, Washington County, Arkansas, Officer J. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonardo Drisdel v. Bill Stange
as 21-1988
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Bill Strange, SECC and Warden Bill Stange, SECC
Petitioner / Appellant:
Leonardo Drisdel
Cynthia Clerk, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1840
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Charles Terry, Cynthia Clerk, Anthony Stallone and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Strange v. Direct Recovery Services, L.L.C.
as 0:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Direct Recovery Services, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Clerk et al v. Aearo Technologies LLC et al
as 0:2020cv02691
Plaintiff:
Charles Terry, Cynthia Clerk, Anthony Stallone and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McFadden v. Strange
as 4:2020cv01046
Petitioner:
Vincent McFadden
Respondent:
William Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Sutton v. Matthew Karshner, et al
as 20-2612
Defendant / Appellee:
Cedric Strange and Matthew Karshner
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Truman Gross v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 20-1627
Defendant / Appellee:
Sammie P. Strange, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Leslie Rutledge, Arkansas Attorney General, Tom Cotton, U.S. Senator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Truman Gross, and White Aryan Resistance
Sutton v. Matthew Karshner, et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Cedric Strange and Matthew Karshner
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strange v. Nelnet Diversified Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03078
Defendant:
Nelnet Diversified Solutions, LLC, Nelnet, Inc. and Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
