Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Redmond v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Kirby Redmond
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Manuel Pomavilla-Pichisaca v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 22-3328
Petitioner:
Manuel Segundo Pomavilla-Pichisaca
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
