Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Danner et al v. Franks et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Danner
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Felisha Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Noah J King
Defendant:
Robert Case, Bailey Burns, Brianna Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Rowland et al
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Cardarylo Snyder and Cardarylo J Snyder
Defendant:
Felicia Rowland and Does Greene County Detention Center Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. FMHP et al
as 0:2022cv01692
Petitioner:
Jesse Rowland
Respondent:
FMHP and MSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Case et al
as 4:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Michael J Gray
Defendant:
Robert Case, Felisha Rowland, Tammy Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael J Gray
Defendant:
Robert Case, Felisha Rowland, Tammy Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Winters et al
as 2:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
Jacob Nathaniel Bowman
Defendant:
Captain Winters, Lieutenant C. Dowdy, Correctional Officer Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Cox et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Brent Cox, Robert Case, Alicia Houble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Hecht et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Matthew Hecht, Dane Barnum and Felisha Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rowland et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Falicia Rowland, Robert Case, Brent Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
