Cases 21 - 30 of 243
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hardy v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Defendant:
Maria T Travis, Department of Veterans Affairs, Maria Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hoskinson et al v. United State of America et al
as 8:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Dona J. Hoskinson and Michael Hoskinson
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Veterans' Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, et al
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Verteran Affairs and A.G. Merrick B. Garland
Defendant / Appellee:
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC and Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael Hill v. Denis McDonough
as 23-1797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis McDonough, Secretary United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.