Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Dejesus-Andujar v. Cox
as 4:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
Sandrio Dejesus-Andujar
Defendant:
Steve Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus-Andujar v. State of Missouri
as 4:2011cv01277
Petitioner:
Sandrio DeJesus-Andujar
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Marcos Gonzales-Celaya
as 11-2131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Marcos Gonzales-Celaya, also known as Marcelino NMN Dejesus, also known as Marcelino Dejesus-Celaya, also known as Fracisco Arellano, also known as Victor Gauilanes, also known as Marcelino Dejesus, also known as Elias Fernandez, also known as Francisco A
United States v. Marcos Gonzales-Celaya
as 11-2129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Marcos Gonzales-Celaya, also known as Marcelino De Jesus-Celaya, also known as Marcelino Dejesus
DeJesus-Andujar v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2010cv03260
Plaintiff:
Sandrio DeJesus-Andujar
Defendant:
Bowersox and Greg Dugger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lopez-Santos v. Ferguson et al
as 5:2008cv05052
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Dejesus Lopez-Santos
Defendant:
Keith Ferguson and Hunter Petray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Santos v. State of Arkansas et al
as 5:2008cv05030
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Dejesus Lopez-Santos
Defendant:
State of Arkansas and Benton County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGill et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03446
Plaintiff:
Joann M McGill, Joann M McGill, Joann M McGill and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
