Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Larchick v. Bautista et al
as 4:2018cv03019
Defendant:
Esteban D. Bautista, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Plaintiff:
Noah A. Larchick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dancer et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv05003
Defendant:
Esteban D. Bautista and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Third Party Plaintiff:
Cash-Wa Distributing Co. of Kearney
Plaintiff:
Kody L. Dancer and Megan Dancer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Chavez-Cruz v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv04157
Plaintiff:
Esteban Chavez-Cruz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Escobar et al v. Rennert et al
as 4:2016cv01731
Plaintiff:
Sandra Bertha Acuna Escobar , Jacqueline Magali Acuna Ibaceta , Rosa Marilyn Aguirre Medina and others
Defendant:
The Doe Run Resources Corporation , Marvin K. Kaiser , Albert Bruce Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2015cv02073
Plaintiff:
Esteban Leroy Oden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States v. Esteban Fuego-Sanchez
as 14-3755
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Esteban Fuego-Sanchez
Arreola v. USA
as 2:2014cv02245
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Esteban Arreola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Esteban Chavez-Cruz
as 14-3524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Esteban Chavez-Cruz, also known as Amigo
Esteban Velazquez-Ramirez v. John Fayram
as 14-1701
Petitioner - Appellant:
Esteban Velazquez-Ramirez
Respondent - Appellee:
John Fayram
Esteban Penaloza Martinez v. United State
as 13-3402
Petitioner:
Esteban Penaloza Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
