Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Murphy et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jona Murphy and Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooks et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02025
Plaintiff:
Albert Cooks , J.G. , T.B. and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Research & Development LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooks et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01302
Plaintiff:
Albert Cooks , Doris Geisler , Penny McFall and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Research and Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01709
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams , Bertha Alexander , Marsha Kay Anderson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jonas Alexander v. Mark Lund
as 16-3667
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jonas Alexander
Respondent - Appellee:
Mark Lund
Cline et al v. DC Power Tong, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jeff Cline and Matthew Simmons
Defendant:
DC Power Tong, LLC, Derek Linghor, Jonas McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jones v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jona L. Jones
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Glidewell v. Martin
as 3:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonas Glidewell
Defendant:
Joey Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kritikos v. Williams County et al
as 4:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kelly Kritikos
Defendant:
Williams County, Royce Crone, Sergeant Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonas v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv03174
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Connie Jonas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
