Cases 21 - 30 of 1,972
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant:
Gary Musselwhite, Lewis Young, Robert Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Lewis Cooney
as 24-2396
Defendant:
Lewis Cooney
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04094
Defendant:
Trevor Foley and Julie Kempker
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Defendant:
Steven Wheeler, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02284
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Cummings v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Lewis Young, Gary Musselwhite and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01923
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Terence Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
