Cases 21 - 29 of 29
McMillen v. Dormire
as 4:2011cv00704
Petitioner:
Steven A. McMillen, Sr.
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMillen v. Dormire
as 4:2011cv00236
Petitioner:
Steven A. McMillen, Sr.
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMillen v. Edgewood Vista Senior Living, Inc.
as 0:2010cv04487
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. McMillen
Defendant:
Edgewood Vista Senior Living, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Cheyenne County et al
as 7:2010cv05009
Defendant:
Cheyenne County, James Collins, Beth Fiegenschuh and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael Neudecker v. Shakopee Police Dept., etc., et al
as 08-3286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Neudecker
Defendant - Appellee:
Shakopee Police Department, Quality Lifestyles, Inc., doing business as Friendship Manor Health Care Center, Scott County Department of Human Services and others
Michael Neudecker v. Shakopee Police Dept., etc., et al
as 08-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Neudecker
Defendant - Appellee:
Shakopee Police Department, Quality Lifestyles, Inc., doing business as Friendship Manor Health Care Center, Scott County Department of Human Services and others
Neudecker v. City of Shakopee et al
as 0:2007cv03506
Plaintiff:
Michael Neudecker
Defendant:
Shakopee Police Department, Quality Lifestyles, Inc., Scott County Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMillen v. Dormire
as 4:2007cv01214
Petitioner:
Steven A. McMillen, Sr.
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillen v. Dormire
as 4:2007cv00460
Petitioner:
Steven A. McMillen, Sr.
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
