Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Spainhour v. Jones et al
as 4:2019cv00202
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, John Does, Andrew W Ballinger and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Spainhour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv00911
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Pope County Detention Center, Sherry Wallis and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Bevis et al
as 4:2018cv00874
Plaintiff:
Brandon King
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Shane Jones, Dustin Mora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv00875
Defendant:
Shane Jones and Pope CountyDistrict Court
Plaintiff:
Jay Lynn Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv00834
Plaintiff:
Frank Curtis Solis, Jr and Frank C Solis, Jr
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Rowdy Sweet and Doug Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Sweet et al
as 4:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
Tommy Barfield
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Shane Jones and Tiger Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Pope County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
Tony Ruiz
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Shane Jones, James Linker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Jones et al
as 4:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Wright
Defendant:
Shane Jones and Rowdy Sweet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Black v. James Linker, et al
as 16-3894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Black
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Captain, Pope County Detention Center and Shane Jones, Sheriff, Pope County
Defendant - Appellee:
James Linker, Lieutenant, Pope County Detention Center (originally named as Jamie Linker), Nathan Neilson, Dr., Pope County Detention Center (originally named as Nathan D. Nielson), Crystal Hull, Sergeant and others
Black v. Sweet et al
as 6:2015cv06095
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Black
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Shane Jones, Jamie Linker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
