Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Marroquin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Hugh Hurwitz, Daniel Tvedt and others
Plaintiff:
Magali Marroquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. US Marshals et al
as 1:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Patrick Richmond
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Lindsey Garner, Monica Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradin v. US Marshals Service et al
as 6:2018cv03402
Defendant:
US Marshals Service Subcontractors, US Marshals Service Contractors and US Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
John Bradin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wistrom v. US Marshalls
as 8:2018cv00337
Respondent:
US Marshalls
Petitioner:
Jacob Raymond Wistrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. West Tennessee Detention Facility et al
as 4:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Arther James
Defendant:
West Tennessee Detention Facility and US Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dinkins v. US Marshals et al
as 4:2018cv00814
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Dinkins
Defendant:
US Marshals, Plane Staff BOP, State of GA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. West Tennessee Detention Facility et al
as 4:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Arther James
Defendant:
West Tennessee Detention Facility and US Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sailors v. US Marshals Service Dept. et al
as 8:2018cv00189
Defendant:
Maxwell Hubka, Cole Jennings, Paul Keyes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Sailors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. US Marshals Service
as 4:2017cv00935
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Robinson
Respondent:
US Marshals Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 4:2017cv00418
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
