Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Vassar v. Steele et al
as 4:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Larry Vassar
Defendant:
Troy Steele, Jamie Crump, Cindy Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Steele et al
as 4:2014cv00425
Plaintiff:
Hashim Mohammad
Defendant:
Troy Steele, Jamie Crump, Cindy Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Steele et al
as 4:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Barry Baker
Defendant:
Troy Steele , Jamie Crump , Cindy Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Walters et al
as 1:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Maurice Campbell
Defendant:
Unknown Walters, Unknown Masegion, Unknown Hudgens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 1:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Arnold
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Dana Nix, Larry Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Jones, et al.
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matthew Page
Defendant:
Unknown Jones and Unknown Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Slay et al
as 4:2012cv01444
Plaintiff:
Dwayne A. Jackson
Defendant:
Francis Slay, Thomas Irwin, Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. MHM Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01544
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cross
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Michael Pinkert, Steven Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Scott v. BJC Behavioral Health, et al
as 11-2833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter F. Scott
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Simms
Defendant - Appellee:
BJC Behavioral Health, Ellen Depker, Official Capacity, Vinita Park Police Department and others
Jacqueline Hayes v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 11-2811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacqueline Hayes
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
