Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Hayes v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
LaJuan Hayes
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Morris v. Gregory Hancock
as 23-2158
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stephen Patrick Morris
Respondent / Appellee:
Gregory Hancock, Warden
William Hancock v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1988
Plaintiff / Appellee:
William Hancock
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Jamerson v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Michael C. Jamerson
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Morris
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Long
Defendant:
Jean Peters Baker, Jordan R Berges, Darryl Forte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
