Cases 31 - 40 of 218
Lamaack v. Menard, Inc.
as 6:2022cv02058
Plaintiff:
Linda Lamaack
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. and Menard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henneberry v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Cathie S. Henneberry
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rhodus v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Vincent Rhodus
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shoemaker v. Menard Inc.
as 2:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Glenn Shoemaker
Defendant:
Menard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Landrus et al v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv06066
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Landrus and Stacey Landrus
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. and Merry Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Laird v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dustin Laird
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Erickson v. Menard, Inc.
as 0:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
David A Erickson and David A. Erickson
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Polansky v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Doris Polansky
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Luoma Enterprises of Duluth, Inc v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Luoma Enterprises and Luoma Enterprises of Duluth, Inc
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Tractor Supply Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Auto-Owners Insurance v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
