Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Teigen v. Yates et al
as 3:2016cv03032
Plaintiff:
Rickee L. Teigen
Defendant:
Gregg Yates , Geoffrey M. Lochansen , Todd Kale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wardell Newsome, II v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-2921
Petitioner:
Wardell Newsome, II
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley
Elease Hill, et al v. City of El Dorado
as 16-2854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elease Hill, Carlton Newsome and Vada Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
City of El Dorado, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado
Newsome v. USA
as 4:2016cv00695
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Robert E. Newsome, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Burl et al
as 5:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Muhammad Jones
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Aundrea F Fitzgerald, Latoya Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreland v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2016cv06048
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Moreland
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Missouri Department of Mental Health Forensics, Steven A Mandracchia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Newsome, Jr. v. United State
as 16-1422
Petitioner:
Robert E. Newsome, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Jessie Hill v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 16-1251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director (former), Arkansas Department of Correction, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Raymond Naylor, Internal Affairs Director/Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Newsome v. USA
as 4:2016cv00058
Movant:
Robert E. Newsome, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hill
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Marvin Evans, Jr, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
