Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Stewart et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2010cv04261
Plaintiff:
Richard B Stewart and David W Stewart
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landin v. Ives
as 8:2010cv00166
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Petitioner:
Pablo R. Landin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rashad v. Ives
as 4:2010cv00391
Movant:
Ahmad Jasir Rashad
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richard Fischer v. J. Sam Steward, et al
as 10-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard B. Fischer
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Sam Steward, Individually and as former Sergeant with Missouri State Highway Patrol, City of St. Charles, Missouri, Timothy Swope, Individually and as former Chief of Police, St. Charles City Police Department and others
Hagan v. Jamison
as 6:2010cv03031
Movant:
Richard B. Hagan
Respondent:
Brian Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagan v. Jamison
as 4:2009cv02050
Petitioner:
Richard B. Hagan
Respondent:
Brian Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Jordan et al
as 4:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
F. Charlene Henderson
Defendant:
John R. Jordan, Jr., Bobby L. Martin, Aubrey B. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lucientes v. Fondren
as 0:2009cv00760
Petitioner:
Richard B. Lucientes
Respondent:
Dwight L. Fondren and Dwight L. Fondren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lockett v. Ives
as 0:2009cv00444
Petitioner:
Melvin D Lockett
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Melvin D. Lockett v. Richard B. Ives
as 0:2008cv06142
Petitioner:
Melvin D Lockett
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
