Cases 41 - 50 of 924
Ball et al v. Nilsson et al
as 0:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jeannie F. Ball, Jennifer J. Ball, Jeannie Ball and others
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson, Ben Frye, Erik Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godbolt v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Arthur Godbolt
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Simpson v. Gable, et al
as 8:2023cv00260
Petitioner:
Arthur C. Simpson
Respondent:
Nebraska, Craig Gable and Bob Jeffrys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Lee, Jr. v. United States
as 23-2381
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arthur Tyrone Lee, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lowrie v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lowrie
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Olson v. Shuster et al
as 0:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Olson
Defendant:
Maureen Correia Shuster, Estate of Stanley Shuster, The and Arthur Shuster Employee Savings & Investment Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Arthur Carson v. UAMS Medical Center, et al
as 23-2215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arthur Carson
Defendant / Appellee:
UAMS Medical Center, Hospital and Daniel Holleyman, Emergency Room Physician
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
