Cases 41 - 50 of 59
EMCASCO Insurance Company et al v. CWK Technology, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02061
Defendant:
Oceanspring Trading, Inc., CWK Technology, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
EMCASCO Insurance Company and Ogilvie Independent School District No. 333
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hacala v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv05131
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Hacala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barkley et al v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Curtis Paul Barkley and Linda Barkley
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burlesque of North America, Inc. et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv01067
Plaintiff:
Burlesque of North America, Inc. and Michael Davis
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Azar Inc., Quill Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FurnitureDealer.net, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 0:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
FurnitureDealer.net, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stokes v. Amazon.com, LLC, et al.
as 6:2017cv03269
Defendant:
Amazon.com, LLC , Ivolution Sports, Inc. and Zhejiang Bio-Industry & Trade Co., LTD
Plaintiff:
Christy Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landrith v. Amazon.com
as 4:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Bret David Landrith
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Jarratt et al v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv05302
Plaintiff:
Hugh Jarratt and Jarratt Industries, LLC,
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and CT Discount Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Grace Manufacturing Inc v. Amazon.com Inc
as 4:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
Grace Manufacturing Inc
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Master D Music Rights, LLC v. Banks et al
as 4:2014cv00826
Defendant:
Thomas Wesley Pentz, Azealia A Banks, Diplo and others
Plaintiff:
Master D Music Rights, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
