Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Daugherty v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2012cv03133
Defendant:
Armstrong, City of Lincoln, Denzin and others
Plaintiff:
Arrmon H. Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. HDR Engineering, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv03068
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, HDR Engineering and HDR, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Daugherty v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2010cv03111
Defendant:
Armstrong, City of Lincoln, Denzin and others
Plaintiff:
Arrmon H. Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
National Swimming Pool Foundation v. Kelley et al
as 8:2010cv00117
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Douglas Clark, Jack Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
National Swimming Pool Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
v. City of Lincoln Police Department
as 4:2009cv03152
Defendant:
City of Lincoln Police Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky E Beenblossom
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Mann v. City of Lincoln et al
as 8:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
Michael Mann
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Lincoln Police Department, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv03147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Van De Mark v. Peterson et al
as 4:2008cv03041
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Van De Mark
Defendant:
Seth Peterson, City of Lincoln, Nebraska and Lancaster, County of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gember v. Lincoln, City of, et al
as 4:2007cv03266
Plaintiff:
Gale Keith Gember
Defendant:
City of Lincoln and Lincoln Area Agency on Aging
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2007cv03220
Plaintiff:
Graylin Gray
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Tom Casady, Nathan Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
