Cases 41 - 50 of 1,951
United States v. Terrell Armstrong
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terrell Jason Armstrong, also known as Lewis, also known as Louis, also known as Louise
Soltis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Craig Lewis Soltis
Defendant:
3M Company, Arizant Healthcare, Inc and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lewis-Crawford v. Dropps et al
as 0:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis-Crawford
Defendant:
Brandy Dropps and Jennifer Shaft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tayborn v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Reginald Tayborn
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, C Hendrick, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lee Boyle
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Trevor S. Foley, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alan Doering v. WellPath, et al
as 24-1026
Plaintiff:
Alan Lewis Doering
Defendant:
WellPath, Medical Provider, ADC, Chris Horan, Doctor, ADC, Lake, APN, North Central Unit, ADC and others
Shelton Partee v. Steven Lewis, et al
as 24-8001
Petitioner:
Shelton Partee
Respondent:
Steven Lewis, Attorney for Aziz, Michael K. Mullen, Probate Judge, Jill M. Hanley, Public Administrator #1 and others
Mason v. Young et al
as 4:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Tommie E Mason
Defendant:
Lewis H Young, Deborah Goodwin, Marshall Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Hale et al
as 4:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Jaylen M Lewis
Defendant:
E Hale and A Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
