Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Elliott v. Murphe et al
as 4:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Bang, Murphe, Zorellis and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leodis Randle v. D. Mussadiq, et al
as 19-2213
Defendant / Appellee:
Lon Watson, Deputy (Originally named as L Watson), Charles Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County (Originally named as Doc Holiday), Seth McKanna, Sergeant, Pulaski County Detention Center (Originally named as McKanna) and others
Defendant:
Williams, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Center, Dedra Hoof, Gibson, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leodis Randle
Newburn v. Repko et al
as 4:2018cv01744
Defendant:
St. Louis, MO VAMC Veterans Administration Medical Center, Angie Nicholson, Ouadir Mohammed and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Newburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montgomery v. Newburn et al
as 4:2018cv00484
Defendant:
Kerry Newburn and Riggs
Plaintiff:
Stacey Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
Esker Martin, III
Defendant:
Vamesha Rogers, Ebonee Bryant, Orlando Newburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Musiddig et al
as 4:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
D Musiddig, Newburns, McKanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aljathiya v. Holiday et al
as 4:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Ckie Mumin Aljathiya
Defendant:
Doc Holiday, Newburn, Mecca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robinson v. Atkins et al
as 4:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
A Atkins, Scott Thomasee, D Armant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
