Cases 41 - 50 of 1,128
Conxtech Inc v. Southwest Steel Processing LLC
as 3:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Conxtech Inc
Defendant:
Southwest Steel Processing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Markel Steele v. Diane Sabatka-Rine
as 22-3486
Petitioner / Appellant:
Markel Da'Quan Steele
Respondent / Appellee:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Midco Diving and Marine Services, LLC, v. CC Steel, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Midco Marine Services and Diving, LLC
Defendant:
CC Steel, LLC, Preston Kromrey, Roger Hartson and others
Rico Paul v. Travis Pacheco
as 22-2921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rico Paul
Defendant / Appellee:
Travis Pacheco, Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity
Defendant:
Troy Steele and Peggy Somerville
Williams v. Merdinian et al
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brayon Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Riley Merdinian, Ashley Davis, Nathan Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Richard Steele
as 22-2684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Steele
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-Family & Medical Leave Act
Bolden v. Steele
as 4:2022cv00631
Petitioner:
Darrell I. Bolden
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Sheriff of Adair County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Brayon J. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff of Adair County Sheriffs Office, Chief of Kirksville Police Department, Prosecutor of the Prosecuting Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
