Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Clinton v. Washington County Public Defender's Office et al
as 5:2010cv05108
Plaintiff:
James Michael Clinton
Defendant:
Washington County Public Defender's Office, Gregg Parrish, John Doe Detainer and Transport Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv00944
Plaintiff:
James Michael Bell
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation
Mullen v. Taylor
as 2:2010cv02019
Plaintiff:
Thurstle Dale Mullen
Defendant:
James Michael Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Yowell et al., v. Bad Apple Bail Bond Services, LLC, et al.,
as 4:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
William Yowell and Bad Boyz Bail Bonds, Inc.
Defendant:
Bad Apple Bail Bond Services, LLC, Melson Bonding, LLC, James Michael Melson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Yowell et al
as 4:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
William Yowell, Bad Boyz Bail Bonds, Inc., Bad Apple Bail Bond Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Steele v. Denney
as 4:2009cv00979
Petitioner:
James Michael Steele
Respondent:
Larry Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Steele v. Jayson Person, et al
as 09-3351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Michael Steele
Defendant - Appellee:
Jayson P. Person, Michael A. Hardin, James W. Langston and others
James Steele v. J. Spear, Jr., et al
as 09-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Michael Steele
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Bartley Spear, Jr., Wes Raines and County of DeKalb, Missouri
Steele v. Schaefer et al
as 5:2009cv06112
Plaintiff:
James Michael Steele
Defendant:
Kate H Schaefer, Mike Strong, Dwight K Scroggins, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
