Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01702
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01675
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01633
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01323
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Azad v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Plaintiff:
Tahir Alama Azad
Defendant:
US Attorney General and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jamal Aden v. William P. Barr, et al
as 19-1635
Not Yet Classified:
Ronald Vitiello, Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jamal Mohamud Aden, Peter B. Berg, Director, St. Paul Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Respondent:
Joel L. Brott
Farass Ali v. Joel Brott
as 19-1244
Respondent:
Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Ronald Vitiello, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G. Whitaker, Attorney General and others
Undetermined:
Farass Ali and Joel L. Brott, Sheriff, Sherburne County
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02652
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ramon Mendoza v. John Does, #1-5, et al
as 16-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Mendoza
Plaintiff:
Laura Mendoza
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and John Does, #6-10
Defendant - Appellee:
John Does, #1-5, Jeff Davis, Sarpy County, Nebraska Sheriff, Justin Osterberg, individually and others
Abdi v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Abdikadir Abdi
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
