Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kleitman v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Kleitman
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Broadspire Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type:
Other Statutes
Arnold v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2010cv05001
Plaintiff:
Donna Arnold
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Lewis v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 4:2009cv00887
Plaintiff:
Melandy Lewis and Melandy Lewis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Reeves v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 4:2009cv00683
Plaintiff:
Paula Reeves and Paula Reeves
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc, United Parcel Service Inc, UPS Flexible Benefits Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dorton et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Norman Dorton and Tanya Dorton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
T & M Cleaning Service v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv06083
Plaintiff:
T & M Cleaning Service
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Robert Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv05185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
