Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02010
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reginald Dunahue v. Curry Branham, et al
as 24-1983
Plaintiff: Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant: Curry Branham, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Kendrick Avery, Lieutenant, Cummins Unit, ADC, Aundrea Culclager, Warden, Tucker Max, ADC and others
Brooks-Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Avery Brooks-Davis
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Keithen L Jones
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Sheriff Birk et al
as 2:2024cv04040
Plaintiff: Robert Avery
Defendant: Sheriff Birk and Steve Hiate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Thomas Drum
as 24-1397
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Thomas Avery Drum
E&M Services, LLC, et al v. United Specialty Ins. Co.
as 24-1343
Plaintiff: Braxton Avery
Defendant: E&M Services, LLC and John Does, 1-25
Cross Defendant: Equinor US, successor Statoil, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: Eklipse Resources, LLC and United Specialty Insurance Company
Washington v. Payne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Fawnie Avery
as 23-3609
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Fawnie Allen Avery
United States v. Avery Edwards
as 23-3618
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Avery Jamal Edwards

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?