Cases 1 - 10 of 843
Shunstrom v. Cordonnier et al
as 6:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Alison Y. Shunstrom
Defendant:
Michael J. Cordonnier and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brondel v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Wayne L Brondel
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Deon Bailey
as 24-2124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Deon Bailey v. United States
as 24-2118
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Bailey v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
Marjory Bailey
Defendant:
Best Buy Co., Inc. and Midea America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koch et al v. Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education, Pleasant Hill R-III School District, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
