Cases 1 - 10 of 350,682
United States of America v. Rogers
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Robert Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Estes v. Tabor
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Respondent:
Judge Stephen Tabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Layne v. Wellpath Medical et al
as 6:2024cv06082
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew Layne
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical and RN Kelly Aunspaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medlock v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02074
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Medlock
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DHL Express (USA), Inc. v. ChrystalClear7 LLC
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Defendant:
ChrystalClear7 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fortune v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Willie C Fortune
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Smith v. GDH Government Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Akira Smith
Defendant:
GDH Government Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Review of Judicial Administrative Decision
Robinson v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Hevonte Robinson
Defendant:
The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Raby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Rebecca A Raby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
