Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States v. Sarah Goforth
as 23-1341
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Sarah Chezahrae Goforth, also known as Sarah Hedrick, also known as Darah Bachelor
Bachelor v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02553
Plaintiff:
Mary Bachelor
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Traver v. Randolph County Jail et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Traver
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail, Randy Smith, Earl Endsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosha v. Bachelor et al
as 4:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Pernell Bosha
Defendant:
Carey G Bachelor and Werner Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
G. Latta Bachelor v. Regions Bank, et al
as 10-2117
:
Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee
Appellant:
G. Latta Bachelor, successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald E. Reagan
Appellee:
Regions Bank and Cheryl A. Reagan
Frederick Wetzel v. Regions Bank, et al
as 10-2123
Appellant:
Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee
:
G. Latta Bachelor, successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald E. Reagan
Appellee:
Regions Bank and Cheryl A. Reagan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2255
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cheryl A. Reagan v. Frederick S. Wetzel, III
as 08-6023
Debtor - Appellant:
Cheryl Anne Reagan and Cheryl Anne Reagan
Objector - Appellee:
Frederick S. Wetzel, III, Trustee, 1919 M Street Associates, L.P. and G. Latt Bachelor, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ronald E. Reagan
Bachelor v. 1919 M Street Associates, L.P.
as 6:2007cv06053
Plaintiff:
G. Latta Bachelor and G. Latta Bachelor
Defendant:
1919 M Street Associates, L.P. and 1919 M Street Associates, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
