Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Avery v. Warden - Tecumseh State CI
as 8:2024cv00327
Respondent:
Warden - Tecumseh State CI
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Nicholas Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
CIS Communications, L.L.C. et al v. Republic Services, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
CIS Communications, L.L.C. and Allied Services L.L.C.
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CIS Communications, L.L.C. v. Republic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00389
Plaintiff:
CIS Communications, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc. and Allied Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Valentine v. One John Doe "CI" et al
as 8:2018cv00068
Defendant:
Officer Bivens, Officer Brown, John Doe Police and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CIS Communications, L.L.C. v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
as 4:2017cv02364
Plaintiff:
CIS Communications, L.L.C.
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
William Cole v. State of Missouri PNP Office, et al
as 14-2079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William K. Cole
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri PNP Office, Vandalia Police Department, CI Ammie and others
Cole v. State of Missouri PNP Office et al
as 2:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
William K. Cole
Defendant:
State of Missouri PNP Office, Vandalia Police Department, CI Ammie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CI Oakhurst v. Commercial State Bank of Wausa
as 8:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
CI Oakhurst
Defendant:
Commercial State Bank of Wausa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.