Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Jackson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Callie Jackson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
Elburki v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2024cv03039
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Ken McClure, City Clerk Anita Cotter and others
Claimant:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki
Plaintiff:
Kamel M. Elburki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hageman et al v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv02096
Plaintiff:
Adam Hagman, Dane Vander Voort, Paul Primrose and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Shannon Reimann, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiegs et al v. Vilsack et al
as 3:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Tiegs, Abraham Jergenson, Cally Jergenson and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Vilsack and Zach Ducheneaux
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ugorets et al v. City of Shorewood et al
as 0:2021cv01446
Plaintiff:
Alex Ugorets and Elena Ugorets
Defendant:
Nathaniel Gorhan, City of Shorewood, Greg Lerud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heggs v. Lindblom et al
as 0:2020cv02118
Defendant:
Cornteya Dingman, Lindsey Kohn, Srg. Derek Hippen and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Heggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
