Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al
as 8:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Defendant:
Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carroll v. Auman et al
as 8:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Carroll
Defendant:
John Auman, Amy Volbrecht, Tracy Cullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Liewer et al
as 8:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Carroll
Defendant:
Cameron Liewer, Andrew Corbin, Brittany Marker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Douglas County et al
as 8:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jaron L Carroll and Jaron L. Carroll
Defendant:
Douglas County, Director Michael Myers, Michael Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Colvin
as 8:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
John W. Carroll
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Koch
as 8:2003cv00406
Interested Party:
Schallina Brown, Latonda Johnson, Tamra Keys and others
Intervenor:
Lisa Carroll
Defendant:
John R. Koch
Movant:
Matthew McBride, Michelle A. Peters and Molly Smolko
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Hess et al v. Bank First et al
as 8:2008cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Hess and Pam K. Hess
Defendant:
Bank First, Clark Froehlich, RJ Gall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carroll v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2008cv00377
Plaintiff:
Colleen M Carroll
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Constance Garro, Mike Ashbrook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
