Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00239
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jared Goyette, et al v. David Hutchinson
as 23-3190
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jared Goyette, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Craig Lassig, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Communications Workers of America, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals and others
Plaintiff: Michael Shum
Defendant / Appellant: City of Minneapolis, Medaria Arradondo, Minneapolis Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacity, Robert Kroll, Minneapolis Police Lieutenant, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: John Does, 1-2, in their individual and official capacities
Sam Wolk v. David Hutchinson, et al
as 23-2939
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sam Wolk
Defendant: City of Brooklyn Center, Tim Gannon, Brooklyn Center Police Chief, in his individual capacity, Tony Gruenig, Brooklyn Center Police Commander, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: David Hutchinson, Hennepin County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and Hennepin County
Sam Wolk v. Tim Gannon
as 23-2944
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sam Wolk
Defendant: City of Brooklyn Center, Tony Gruenig, Brooklyn Center Police Commander, in his individual capacity, David Hutchinson, Hennepin County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: Tim Gannon, Brooklyn Center Police Chief, in his individual capacity
Sam Wolk v. MN Dept. Natural Resources, et al
as 23-2943
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sam Wolk
Defendant: City of Brooklyn Center, Tim Gannon, Brooklyn Center Police Chief, in his individual capacity, Tony Gruenig, Brooklyn Center Police Commander, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Aaron Kahre, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Incident Commander Captain, in his individual capacity and Rodman Smith, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Director of Enforcement Colonel, in his individual capacity
Sam Wolk v. City of Brooklyn Center, et al
as 23-2940
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sam Wolk
Defendant / Appellant: City of Brooklyn Center and Tony Gruenig, Brooklyn Center Police Commander, in his individual capacity
Defendant: Tim Gannon, Brooklyn Center Police Chief, in his individual capacity, David Hutchinson, Hennepin County Sheriff, in his individual capacity, Hennepin County and others
Randall Beasley v. WV State Trooper Lowe, et al
as 23-2382
Plaintiff / Appellant: Randall Jay Beasley, a Sovereign, a Citizen of one of the Several States, et al
Defendant / Appellee: West Virginia State Trooper Lowe, West Virginia State Trooper Jan Cahill, Superintendent, Colonel for the state of West Virginia and others
Cunningham v. Kahler et al
as 6:2023cv03076
Plaintiff: Michael Cunningham
Defendant: Trooper Amanda Kahler, Missouri State Highway Patrol and Colonel Eric T Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Beasley v. West Virginia State Trooper Lowe et al
as 0:2023cv00264
Plaintiff: Randall Jay Beasley
Defendant: West Virginia State Trooper Lowe, West Viginia State Trooper Jan Cahill, Superintendent-Colonel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundell Farming Company LP, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 22-3184
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lundell Farming Company LP and LFCLP1 LLC
Defendant / Appellee: The United States Army Corps of Engineers, Ryan D. McCarthy, In his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Army, Todd T. Semonite, Lieutenant General, in his Official Capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Defendant: City of Clarendon

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?