Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haacke v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00249
Petitioner:
Daniel James Haacke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States v. Daniel Decker
as 20-3300
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel James Decker
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Akers v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01050
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Akers
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Weighill et al v. Mayo Clinic Health System et al
as 0:2019cv02598
Defendant:
Mano Clinic Heatth System, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Dr's & Nurses Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina C. Weighill and Daniel James Weighill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stickford v. Marable Transports Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00568
Defendant:
James Daniel, Marable Transports Inc and Chad Daniel James
Plaintiff:
Daniel Stickford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mastalir et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02204
Plaintiff:
Justin Miller, Larry Dee Mcdonald, Gerald Meidl and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC, Does 1-50 and others
Mercer v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 4:2008cv04062
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Mercer
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Domtar Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Baugh v. Gaines et al
as 4:2007cv01067
Plaintiff:
David G. Baugh
Defendant:
C.R. Gaines, William M. Gum, Daniel James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
