Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Feranec et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01116
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Feranec , Patricia Crawford , Michael L. Hoskin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Charles James
as 08-3181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. James
James v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2008cv00392
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jean E James, Jean E James and Jean E James
Cause Of Action: Diversity
James v. Wyeth et al
as 0:2008cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jean E. James, Jean E. James and Jean E. James
Defendant:
Wyeth and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
United States of America v. James et al
as 4:2007cv00621
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aldridge E. James, Jr. and Concept Marketing International Trust
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. James et al
as 4:2007mc09027
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aldridge E. James, Jr. and Concept Marketing International Trust
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
James v. Novacek et al
as 7:2007cv05008
Plaintiff:
Curtis E. James, Curtis E. James and Curtis E. James
Defendant:
Jay Novacek, Jay Novacek, Leanne Novacek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Adkison et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00329
Plaintiff:
Linda S Adkison, Linda S Adkison, Sybil E James and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
