Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ashley Zieser v. Edward Bearden
as 22-2698
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ashley Olsen Zieser
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Bearden
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1 and Jane or John Doe #2
Karen Keil v. Edward Bearden
as 22-2694
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Karen Backues Keil
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1, Jane or John Doe #2 and Jane or John Doe #3
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Bearden
Trenady George v. Edward Bearden
as 22-2699
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Trenady George
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Bearden
Lynnsey Betz v. Edward Bearden
as 22-2697
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lynnsey Christie Betz
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Bearden
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1 and Jane or John Doe #2
Teri Dean v. Anne Precythe
as 21-3093
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Teri L. Dean
Defendant:
Edward Bearden, In their Individual Capacity, Elijah L. Mosier, In their Individual Capacity, Todd E. Mustain, In their Individual Capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, in her Individual and Official Capacities
Doe v. Bearden et al
as 5:2019cv06161
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Mr. Edward Bearden and Edward Bearden
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Bearden et al
as 5:2019cv06022
Plaintiff:
Teri L. Dean
Defendant:
Elijah L. Mosier, Director Anne L. Precythe, Edward Bearden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zieser v. Bearden et al
as 5:2018cv06103
Defendant:
Edward Bearden, Vevia Sturm, John or Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Olsen Zieser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betz v. Bearden et al
as 5:2018cv06079
Plaintiff:
Lynnsey Christie Betz
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe #1 , John or Jane Doe #2 , Edward Bearden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keil v. MHM Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06074
Plaintiff:
Karen Backues Keil
Defendant:
MHM Services, Inc. , John Dunn , John or Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
