Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Alba Morales, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2146
Petitioner:
Alba Maria Morales and Jeremy Fabian Morales
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Eric Adams, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Eric Adams, Clarence Anderson, William Anderson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Brad Stevens v. MN Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 21-2055
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane and John Does, all in their official and individual capacities, Ryan Chukuske, Stacey Sonnek and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Ronald Stevens
Jeffrey Abrams, Jr., et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1847
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gary Russell, Darryl Whitfield, Javon Hutley and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
Hazel Hyleman, Sean Raskosky, Marcus Carter and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Abrams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02419
Plaintiff:
Henry Whitmire, Michael Wood, Thomas Black and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Allman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02338
Plaintiff:
Hazel Hyleman, Sean Raskosky, Guy Wood and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Davenport v. Kansas City Missouri, City of, et al
as 4:2020cv00891
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Tyronna Lemmones, Officer Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Davenport
Stevens v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv02172
Defendant:
Jeffrey Peterson, Robert Elsen, Minnesota Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooksey-Bonner et al v. Doe et al
as 4:2020cv01061
Plaintiff:
naomi Cooksey-Bonner, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Helen Rattler and others
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
