Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Get Loud Arkansas et al v. Thurston et al
as 5:2024cv05121
Plaintiff:
Get Loud Arkansas, Vote.org, Nikki Pastor and others
Defendant:
John Thurston, Sharon Brooks, Jamie Clemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Butler
Defendant:
Doe and Calvin Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Terrell A Harrell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrell v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01192
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrell
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Weeks et al
as 3:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Ryan Poe
Defendant:
Adam Weeks, Calvin Harrell and Paula Woodside
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urrey v. Harrell et al
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Mark A Urrey
Defendant:
Calvin Harrell, Abraham Keefer and C Ryan Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Destiny Harrell and Ann Larkin
Defendant:
John Doe and FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Flowers v. Harrell et al
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Roy Flowers
Defendant:
Harrell, Keith Bowers, Craighead County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
James Lamar Harrell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harrell v. Page et al
as 4:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Harrell Berryhill, William Straughn, Justine Minor and others
Plaintiff:
Buster Nelson Harrell, V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
