Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Shawn Duncan v. Joshua Tessier, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Head Practitioner, Naphcare, Polk County Jail and others
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1152
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Ontravarious, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Chief Clerk and all Clerks Involved from Miller County, AR and others
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Department and others
Brainerd v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brainerd v. Ward, et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Lt. Ontravarious, Chief Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sivels v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sivels
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Services, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laliberte v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
David Laliberte
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNoel v. The Waters of Fort Smith, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02140
Plaintiff:
Anna McNoel
Defendant:
The Waters of Fort Smith, LLC and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Doe et al
as 0:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Darius Hakeem Brooks
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakemore v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2021cv00841
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Blakemore, III
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, John Doe 1-2, John Doe 3-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
