Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Stephens v. O'Hare
as 4:2026cv00276
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Stephens
Respondent:
Kristen O'Hare
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. v. Brandon Ashabranner, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00106
Plaintiff:
Simplot AB Retail, Inc.
Defendant:
Brandon Ashabranner, LLC, Brandon Ashabranner and Kristen Ashabranner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mendez v. Stoller et al
as 1:2026cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kristen Mendez
Defendant:
Jack Stoller and Dawn Hill-Kearse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mendez v. Stoller et al
as 4:2026cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kristen Mendez
Defendant:
Jack Stoller and Dawn Hill-Kearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Potts et al v. United States
as 0:2026cv02276
Petitioner:
Craig K. Potts and Kristen H. Potts
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Medlin v. Law et al
as 6:2026cv03213
Plaintiff:
Haven Medlin
Defendant:
Nathan Law, Sarah Spurlock-Patterson, Patricia Drinkall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tester v. City of Pleasant Hope, MO et al
as 6:2026cv03203
Plaintiff:
Paul Ashley Tester
Defendant:
City of Pleasant Hope, MO, Harold Gambriel, Lisa Gambriel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Yetmer et al
as 4:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Davis
Defendant:
Adam Yetmer, Dimitrius Bowens, Dale Higgins and others
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Peterzalek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
