Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Curtis et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis, Margie Curtis and Dwight Houston
Defendant:
Larry Taylor, Billy Burris, Asa Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Curtis et al v. Neal et al
as 4:2019cv00770
Defendant:
Justice Ferrell, John Does, Rowdy Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Curtis and Larry Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Tate v. United State
as 16-2870
Petitioner:
Larry Curtis Tate
Respondent:
United States of America
United States v. Larry Tate
as 12-2744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Larry Curtis Tate
Larry Curtis Tate v. United States
as 09-3390
Petitioner - Appellant:
Larry Curtis Tate
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Tate v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2009cv01052
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Larry Curtis Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Moses Holloway, et al v. City of Des Arc Arkansas, et al
as 06-3890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Moses Holloway and Lisa Holloway
Defendant:
City of Des Arc Arkansas, Leon Moon, in his individual and official capacity and Rick Parsons, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
Darrell Turner, in his individual and official capacity, Larry Curtis, in his individual and official capacity, Glen Parsons, in his individual and official capacity and others
Moses Holloway, et al v. Leon Moon, et al
as 06-3738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Moses Holloway and Lisa Holloway
Defendant:
City of Des Arc Arkansas, Darrell Turner, in his individual and official capacity, Larry Curtis, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Leon Moon, in his individual and official capacity and Rick Parsons, in his individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.