Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gebel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00820
Plaintiff:
Alice Pollman, Joyce Cox, Vanessa Brown and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association et al
as 0:2013cv02944
Plaintiff:
Shelly Abrams , Tonya Davis , Debra Griffin and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association , Nuveen Asset Management, LLC , U.S. Bancorp Compensation Committee and others
Movant:
Adetayo Adedipe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Adedipe v. US Bank National Association et al
as 0:2013cv02687
Plaintiff:
Adetayo Adedipe
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Nuveen Asset Management LLC, Richard K. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Marcus Maley v. F.B.I.
as 11-3723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marcus A. Maley
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Maley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 4:2011cv01154
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Maley
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maley v. Wyandotte County Kansas et al
as 4:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Maley
Defendant:
Wyandotte County Kansas and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maley v. State of Kansas et al
as 4:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Maley
Defendant:
State of Kansas and Kansas Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maley v. Norris et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Maley
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Arkansas, State of, John Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maley v. Maples et al
as 1:2009cv00056
Defendant:
J Maples, Arkansas, State of and Scott Grimes Unit
Plaintiff:
Marcus Aaron Maley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Maley et al
as 3:2009cv03072
Plaintiff:
Marcus Aaron Maley
Defendant:
J. Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
