Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Raymond McElroy v. Jonah Beadles, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
Raymond McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles, Deputy Sheriff, Greene County Jail and James Arnott, Sheriff, Greene County Jail
Church v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Justin Dale Church
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jamison Doeden, Kathryn Halverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Beadles et al
as 6:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Raymond Glenn McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles and James Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Doe
as 5:2024cv05031
Plaintiff:
Jerel McElroy
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElroy v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jerel McElroy
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McElroy v. Kansas Counselors, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Davarius McElroy
Defendant:
Kansas Counselors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McElroy v. Polack et al
as 5:2024cv05022
Plaintiff:
Jerel R. McElroy
Defendant:
Detention Officer David Pollock, John or Jane Doe Detention Officers, Deputy David Polack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Payne
as 4:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElroy et al v. Schnider et al
as 5:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
Colby McElroy and Jessica McElroy
Defendant:
Patricia Jo Schnider Personally doing business as Green Realty doing business as Jo Schnider Property Management, Christina Allen and Bradley Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hale v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04085
Plaintiff:
James McElroy
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
