Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shawn Manning v. C.J. Ryan, et al
as 20-3490
Defendant / Appellee:
Matt McCleary, Lieutenant, Dean Naylor, Captain, Dahm, Sargent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Michael Manning
Manning v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00057
Petitioner:
Shawn Michael Manning
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Manning v. Muscatine County Jail
as 4:2018cv00254
Defendant:
Muscatine County Jail
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. USA
as 4:2015cv01551
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jason Manning/Rogers v. Curtis Meinzer, et al
as 13-2937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Michael Manning/Rogers
Defendant - Appellee:
Curtis Meinzer, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, James Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC, Larry D. May, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
United States v. Michael Manning
as 13-1016
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Manning
Manning/Rogers v. Meinzer et al
as 5:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Manning/Rogers
Defendant:
Curtis L Meinzer, J Banks, Larry D May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammett v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04013
Plaintiff:
Rawlings H. Hammett
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Jeremiah W. Nixon, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
Fesenmeyer v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04005
Plaintiff:
Paula Fesenmeyer
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Jeremiah W Nixon, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Pollutants & Permit Violations
Torregrosa v. Blunt et al
as 2:2007cv04010
Plaintiff:
Joseph Torregrosa
Defendant:
Matt Blunt, Jeremiah (Jay) W Nixon, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
