Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Thelma Williams, Jr. v. Jacob Franklin, et al
as 22-2813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thelma Williams, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jacob Franklin, Prosecuting Attorney, Faulkner County Circuit Court, Robert N. Jeffery, Public Defender, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, 20th Judicial District, Charles E. Clawson, III, Judge, Faulkner County Circuit Court and others
Williams v. Franklin et al
as 4:2021cv00983
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Jacob Franklin, Robert N Jeffery, Charles E Clawson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowell v. Reidmueller
as 4:2020cv00532
Plaintiff:
Joe Bernard Nowell, Jr
Defendant:
Christofer Reidmueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowell v. Stewart et al
as 4:2019cv00444
Plaintiff:
Joe Bernard Nowell, Jr
Defendant:
L Phillips, Gary Stewart, Monte Munyan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintero Community Assoc. Inc., et al v. FDIC as Receiver, et al
as 14-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Quintero Community Association Inc., Lyle P. Phillips, Phillips W. Upham, II and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Hillcrest Bank, Private Club Financial Management, Crossover Capital LLC and others
Quintero Community Association Inc. et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Hillcrest Bank et al
as 4:2011cv00893
Plaintiff:
Quintero Community Association Inc. , Lyle P. Phillips , Philips W. Upham II and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Hillcrest Bank , Private Club Financial Management LLC, Crossover Capital LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nowell v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 0:2008cv05553
Plaintiff:
Audrey Nowell
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic International Technology Inc, Medtronic Puerto Rico Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
