Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. MHC Roofing & Construction Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00114
Defendant:
R Perry Morris and MHC Roofing & Construction Inc
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goodpasture v. Automated Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Curtis L Goodpasture
Defendant:
Automated Systems, Inc. and Brad R Perry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Ali v. Darrow et al
as 6:2017cv06093
Plaintiff:
Omar Hakeem Ali
Defendant:
Courtney Thomas Darrow, Woody R Perry, Josh Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Darrow et al
as 4:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
Omar Hakeem Ali
Defendant:
Courtney Thomas Darrow, Woody R Perry, Fain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Crews et al
as 4:2013cv01883
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Perry
Defendant:
T. Crews, John Doe, M. Figge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Wallace
as 4:2013cv01403
Petitioner:
Mark R. Perry
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Perry v. Jerome Stubblefield, et al
as 11-2615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark R. Perry
Defendant - Appellee:
Jerome Stubblefield, CO1 B. Martin and Dwayne Darden
Mark Perry v. Al Luebbers, et al
as 11-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark R. Perry
Defendant - Appellee:
Al Luebbers, Superintendent, FCC, Individually and Officially and James Crump, Functional Unit Manager, FCC, Individually and Officially
Perry v. Luebbers et al
as 4:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Perry
Defendant:
Al Luebbers and James Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenters District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity et al v. Calvary Contracting, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Carpenters District Council of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity , Terry M. Nelson , John P. Mulligan and others
Defendant:
Calvary Contracting, LLC , Christian Brothers, LLC and Dennis R. Perry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
