Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 8:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board and U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Samuel Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 12-2935
Petitioner:
Samuel Hernandez
Respondent:
Railroad Retirement Board
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant / Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
BNSF Railway Company v. Mickey et al
as 4:2012cv00598
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Lawrence Mickey , Internal Revenue Service and United States Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogge v. United States of America Railroad Retirement Board et al
as 4:2011cv03062
Defendant:
Jerome F. Kever, Mr. Michael S. Schwartz, V.M. Speakman, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Rogge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mark Piller, et al v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 10-2510
Petitioner:
Mark F. Piller, Linda K. (Piller) Dawson and Estate of Judith K. Piller
Respondent:
Railroad Retirement Board
Samuel Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 09-3761
Petitioner:
Samuel Hernandez
Respondent:
Railroad Review Board and Railroad Retirement Board
Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 6:2009cv03389
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hernandez
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
