Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Zakarian et al v. The Rawlings Company et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Martin Zakarian and Mary Jones
Defendant:
The Rawlings Company, Rawlings Financial Services, LLC and Rawlings & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rawls et al v. CMH Homes Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Jeff Rawls and Lindsey Rawls
Defendant:
CMH Homes Inc, CMH Manufacturing Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Rawls v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Cindy Rawls
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
United States v. O.C. Rawls
as 23-2170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
O.C. Rawls
Rawlings v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
Alicia Jean Rawlings
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gill v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06021
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, Nurse Ables, US Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Markham v. Tolbert et al
as 0:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Oji Konata Markham
Defendant:
A. Tolbert, B. Miller, C. Glirbas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06013
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, U.S. Judge Susan O. Hickey, U.S.Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Francis et al
as 3:2021cv05064
Plaintiff:
Tanya Burns
Defendant:
Kail Francis, Murphy Family Ventures, LLC, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boyd et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Theresa Russell, Monica Salazar, Tamar Perkinson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, PTI Royston, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
