Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Crown Iron Works Company v. Farias et al
as 0:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
Crown Iron Works Company
Defendant:
Ariel Farias, Luis Rivas and Scott Taff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Garcia Sanchez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 4:2023cv03102
Plaintiff:
Mario Joel Garcia Sanchez, Antonio Beatriz Cortes, Josue Heriberto Rivas Santos and others
Defendant:
USCIS Nebraska Service Center, Ur M. Jaddou and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Calderon Rivas
as 8:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Marlon Omar Calderon Rivas
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ada Rivas-Ramos v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1202
Petitioner:
Ada Merary Rivas-Ramos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Rivas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivas
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
United States v. Jorge Rivas
as 22-2418
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Alberto Rivas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
